Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

NSPCC

Home
Search/Contents
Mission Statement
Child Contact
Petition
Press Releases
Funding
FGM New Bill
Contact Us
Links
Jewish Links
Christian Links
Other Links
Restoration Links
Associates of MGM
NSPCC

 

What NORM-UK experienced.

See their account at the following page:

http://www.norm-uk.org/nspcc.html

What SMC experienced with the NSPCC.

The following is a close reproduction of the letter that is sent out to those enquiring about the NSPCC's policy on Male Genital Mutilation [MGM] or as they term it, 'circumcision'.  In another letter dated 22nd July 2003 to SMC they state that ". Due to the wide range of concerns the NSPCC and members of the public have it would not be feasible or practical to contain all our policies on our website."

This is strange as there are many sites with a massive amount of documentation regarding many subjects.  The letter on their policy is stored on computer therefore that digital information could surely be stored on the site together will all their policy's, it would be cheaper than posting a letter for each request. Their declared income from 1st April 2001 to 31 March 2002 was £86,977,496.  Put another way nearly £87 million.  Surely the money saved could go to help towards making their policy on MGM 'active' rather than passive.

SMC has decided to put this information fully in the public domain at our own expense.  Pleas see the letter below.

You can see what the NSPCC is about, including it's statutory powers on:

http://www.nspcc.org.uk/html/home/aboutus/aboutus.htm

If you have any concerns please e-mail them or write:

swilkins@nspcc.org.uk

National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

 

Weston House

42 Curtain Road

London EC2A 3NH

 

Telephone: 020 7825 2500

Fax: 020 7825 2525

www.nspcc.org.uk 

13th June 2003

The NSPCC recognises that there are sometimes compelling medical reasons for circumcising male children, although in very many cases conservative therapeutic practices are effective, carry fewer risks and are less intrusive.

When the decision has been made to circumcise an infant, we recommend that the procedure should be performed under anaesthetic in hygienic conditions, by a paediatric surgeon, a urologist or other experienced and specially trained doctor.  All surgical operations carry a slight risk, associated both with the procedure and with the use of anaesthetic, which should be clearly explained to the parents.

The UN Convention on the rights of the Child established the following rights and obligations in relation to children:

bulletChildren should be protected from 'all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse' (Article 19.2)
bulletStates that 'Parties shall take all effective and appropriate measures with a view to abolishing traditional practices prejudicial to the health of children.' (Article 24.3)

The NSPCC recognises that the circumcision of male children has deep religious and cultural significance for many people and communities all over the world.  It is, however, a practice capable of causing injury and suffering to infants and children unable to consent to such a procedure.  We therefore urge parents and practicing communities to take all necessary steps to reduce children's suffering and to consider whether circumcision is desirable or necessary.  We would suggest that it may be preferable for young adult males to make an informed choice to be circumcised for cultural, religious or other reasons, rather than be operated on as a non-consenting infant.

Signed,

Duncan Moore

Publications and Information Officer

 

© SMC 2003    Last update 8th May 2004

The circumcision of any child without unavoidable medical need is an abuse of human rights of the child and the adult the child will become.  It is a barbaric act of sexual abuse which degrades and shames any society that allows it.